• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY PROMUS ELEMENT ¿ LONG; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY PROMUS ELEMENT ¿ LONG; STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Model Number H7493911338270
Device Problem Defective Component (2292)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/21/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age at time of event: 18 years or older.Device is a combination product.(b)(6).(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr: promus element mr ous 2.75 x 38mm stent delivery system was returned for analysis.A visual examination of the stent revealed damage.Proximal struts 1 and 2 were pulled in a proximal direction.The remainder of the stent was undamaged.The undamaged crimped stent outer diameter was measured and the result was within maximum crimped stent profile measurement.The bumper tip of the device was examined and no issues were noted.The balloon cones were reviewed and no issues were noted.The balloon wings were tightly wrapped and evenly folded and were not subjected to positive pressure.The balloon was inflated to rated burst pressure.The stent deployed without issue.The balloon deflated in 8 seconds and is within the specification.A visual and tactile examination of the hypotube revealed no signs of kinks or damage.An examination of the shaft polymer extrusion identified no issues.The bi-component bond showed no signs of damage or strain.There were no issues advancing the device over a 0.014¿ guidewire.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The investigation conclusion was unable to be determined.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 16-apr-2018.It was reported that stent was defective.Vascular access was obtained via the femoral artery.The 80% stenosed, 2.75mm in diameter, concentric, de novo target lesion was located in the moderately tortuous and moderately calcified ostial left circumflex and proximal to mid left anterior descending artery.Pre-dilation was performed with a 2.75x15 balloon catheter leaving a 50% residual stenosis.With the support of a non-bsc guide extension catheter, a 2.75x38mm promus element ¿ long drug-eluting stent was advanced to treat the lesion.However, stent was defective as the procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was stable.However, returned device analysis revealed proximal stent damage.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROMUS ELEMENT ¿ LONG
Type of Device
STENT, CORONARY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key7500139
MDR Text Key107829899
Report Number2134265-2018-03828
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeEG
PMA/PMN Number
SIMILAR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/16/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/09/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/30/2018
Device Model NumberH7493911338270
Device Catalogue Number39113-3827
Device Lot Number20851718
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/30/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/16/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/14/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Weight68
-
-