The product was not returned for evaluation.The provided video was reviewed by qa and r&d.The device preparation was not shown.The device tip comes into view and is inserted into the incision.The lens is rapidly advanced from out of view (mid-nozzle) into the eye.It can be observed that the plunger has overridden the optic.There is a jump as the lens is advanced into the eye.The lens is positioned with an instrument.Slight edge damage is observed where the plunger advanced over the optic.A large piece of loose matter is observed floating onto the anterior optic surface as the eye is filled with solution.The video ends.The lens remains implanted.No intervention shown.Product history records were reviewed and the documentation indicated the product met release criteria.A non-qualified viscoelastic was indicated.Based on review of the provided video the root cause for the reported events appears to be related to a failure to follow the dfu.The lens was advanced from mid-nozzle directly into the eye.The lens was not inspected at the fill line as directed.A plunger override was plainly visible as the lens was advanced.This should have been detected at the inspection step and use of the device discontinued.The observed "jump" into the eye was due to the override and the speed of the delivery.In addition, a non-qualified viscoelastic was indicated.Material properties of non-qualified ovds may contribute to underfill, overfill, misfolding of the haptics, or other inconsistent folding outcomes.As stated in the dfu, only qualified viscoelastics must be used in conjunction with the device.All other viscoelastics are not qualified for use.Lens delivery performance may be negatively affected when using other non-qualified viscoelastics leading to lens delivery issues and /or damage.The use of non-qualified viscoelastics is considered a failure to follow the dfu and is not recommended under any circumstance.(b)(4).
|