|
Corrected data: removed concomitant and revision surgery date, per quality assurance evaluation.Manufacturer narrative: the reason for this reported incident was due to a dislocation.This event did not involve the device being removed.Closed reduction occurred 1.8 years from date of primary surgery.There is no information in this complaint about any patient injuries, activities, or accidents that may have contributed to the need for this reported incident.There are no reported pre-existing patient health conditions.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery.The surgery was completed as intended.A review of the implant device history records (dhr), shows that the reported component used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were non-conforming material reports (ncmrs) associated with the device, but they did not contribute to the reported event.The device was verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and was within its expiration date at the time of use during the primary surgery.Non-conforming material report (nmr) number 7510, which documents a nonconformance that 3 quantity items were rejected for go side not go.This scalloped profile controls the fit between the shell and liner.The failure to pass the go gage indicates that the feature was undersized.Any impact on the mating relationship would have been identified during the implantation process.This issue could not have contributed to the incident reported.Non-conforming material report (nmr) number 7438, which documents a nonconformance that 9 quantity items were rejected for go side of gage does not go into part.This scalloped profile controls the fit between the shell and liner.The failure to pass the go gage indicates that the feature was undersized.Any impact on the mating relationship would have been identified during the implantation process.This issue could not have contributed to the incident reported.8 quantities were rejected for nonconformance, out of tolerance range between.003-.010.This specification is for the outer diameter of the shell.The specification was updated in revision g but these parts were manufactured to revision f.(engineering change order) eco#04471 included the part disposition "use as is" for all parts on order.This issue could not have contributed to the incident reported.Customer complaint history of the reported device showed no present trends or on-going issues that are in need of review.The root cause of this event is due to dislocation.There were no findings during this analysis that indicate that the reported device was defective.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an event that are outside of the control of djo surgical.Inventory containment is not required as there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.
|