The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) of reby2215 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a kinked accucath peripheral iv catheter was inconclusive because the originally implicated device was not returned for evaluation.The product returned for evaluation was seven 20ga x 2.25¿ accucath peripheral iv catheter assemblies.Each sample was received in its original sealed packaging.The samples were unremarkable to gross inspection.Attempts to advance the guidewires and catheters of each sample were successful and unremarkable.Tactile inspection of the catheters was unremarkable.Microscopic inspection of the samples was unremarkable.No deficiencies were discovered during evaluation of the returned samples; however, the returned samples were unused lot samples.The device implicated in the event description was not returned for evaluation.Consequently this complaint is inconclusive at this time.A lot history review (lhr) of reby2215 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|