• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102R; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 102R; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 102R
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Fibrosis (3167); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 04/25/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
During a prophylactic generator replacement surgery for this patient¿s m102r to a m104, while removing the m102r, it was observed that the header of the device had become detached from the generator.It was unclear exactly when the header had become detached.The patient had a significant amount of breast tissue and the generator was beneath the nipple, so the or specialist believed that the header detachment occurred as a result of the physician trying to get the generator out of the patient's body with the clamp and due to a lot of scar tissue.It was also stated that the battery migrated far away from where it was implanted.He interrogated the m102r after explant and saw that the battery was ok, but that no current was being delivered.The surgeon stated that the battery must have not been sutured down in one of the previous 2 surgeries.There was a lot of tissue and adhesions, so the battery was hard to get to and took time.The explanted generator was received for analysis and analysis is underway but has not been completed to date.No additional or relevant information has been received to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Describe event, corrected data, initial mdr inadvertently reported that the surgery was due to the migration while in fact the migration was discovered during surgery, while the surgery was already being performed for prophylactic reasons.
 
Event Description
Product analysis for the generator was completed and approved.Diagnostics testing during the implant period did not report a high impedance condition.After a window was cut into the can to attach wires and test leads to make output connections to the final test fixture, the device performed according to functional specifications of the current automated final test 102.Other than the header anomaly, there was no performance or any other type of adverse condition found with the pulse generator.The header detachment was found to be possibly explant related.During the initial report, there was no indication that the surgery was for suspected migration.The surgery was only performed prophylactically and then migration was seen during surgery.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 102R
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key7525800
MDR Text Key108636541
Report Number1644487-2018-00808
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/25/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/31/2012
Device Model Number102R
Device Lot Number2762
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/10/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/25/2018
Initial Date FDA Received05/18/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/14/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/25/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/17/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age23 YR
-
-