|
Product complaint # (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the complaint device was reported broken into two pieces with the fragment left in the patient.The remaining device was discarded by the customer therefore, device is not available for a physical evaluation.Pictures were not provided.This complaint is not confirmed.No further information regarding the procedure, or the device has been provided.Patient¿s condition is stable and unknown if a revision surgery is required to remove the broken fragment.A possible root cause for the reported failure could not be determined.The dhr review indicated that this batch of devices were processed without incident, therefore, there is no evidence of manufacturing anomalies on the records reviewed.Further, a review of the depuy synthes mitek complaints system revealed no complaints of any type for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.Based on the information available this complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.However, if additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.(b)(4).
|