An event regarding malposition and metallosis involving a triathlon baseplate was reported.The event was confirmed through clinician review of the medical records provided.Method & results: device evaluation and results: visual inspection was performed as part of the material analysis report (mar)it states: damage was observed on the proximal surface of the baseplate, consistent with contact against the femoral component.Biological fixation was observed on the distal surface of the baseplate.The mar concluded: damage was observed on the femoral component, insert and baseplate consistent with contact against each other.Debris was observed on the insert, likely from the femoral component.Eds showed the femoral component, baseplate and debris were consistent with astm f75 alloy.Burnishing, scratching and third-body indentations were observed on the insert.These are common damage modes of uhmwpe.Explantation damage and markings consistent with contact against the baseplate were also observed on the insert.Based on the given information, no identifiable materials or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined.Medical records received and evaluation: the medical review indicated: baseplate malposition in excessive posterior tibial slope has caused flexion instability of the knee with the femoral component riding over the posterior border of the baseplate with bearing causing poly wear and metallosis due to metal-metal contact between femur and tibia requiring revision after 5-years.Device history review: indicated all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusion: the medical review indicated that baseplate malposition in excessive posterior tibial slope has caused flexion instability of the knee with the femoral component riding over the posterior border of the baseplate with bearing causing poly wear and metallosis due to metal-metal contact between femur and tibia requiring revision after 5-years.No further investigation is required at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|