| Catalog Number |
3548212 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
03/23/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A device history record review is in progress.Once completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6) female patient underwent a breast reconstruction with a mentor cpx 4 breast tissue expander 350 cc and experienced deflation on the left breast tissue expander.On (b)(6) 2018, the surgeon noticed asymmetry during inflation process during the expansion process.Then, every week on expansion, the left tissue expander appeared smaller in size.As a result, the patient had undergone explantation on (b)(6) 2018.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On 05/23/18, it was reported to mentor that the device history record (dhr) for the lot number 7472653 has been reviewed and it was verified that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specifications and procedures.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On 06/28/18, it was reported to mentor that the device evaluation and investigation have been completed.The device was received with no fluid.A rent (a) was observed within an area of siltex cracking on the anterior aspect, measuring approximately 2.5 cm.A second rent (b) was discovered at junction patch on the anterior aspect.Microscopic examination of the edges of the rent b gave no indications as to cause.No other anomalies were found.Complaint was confirmed.Breast implants are not considered lifetime devices and deflation is a known complication associated with these devices and is referenced in our product insert data sheet; however, deflation trends for mentor saline-filled devices will continue to be monitored by quality assurance.Siltex cracking is defined as a material separation occurring in the siltex layer and can eventually progress through the shell of siltex devices.Mentor believes that siltex cracking is ultimately a result of high stresses caused by acute folds (i.E., severe ¿v¿ or tight folds) in the rtv shell of siltex saline mammaries.The severity level for this complaint code was determined to be a s3, which is defined as: necessitates intrusive medical or surgical intervention.Because product evaluation team was unable to confirm any unusual failure mode, no corrective action will be taken at this time.Breast implants are not considered lifetime devices and deflation is a known complication associated with these devices and is referenced in our product insert data sheet.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2018, it was reported to mentor that the mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun, but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.In addition, it was reported that the tissue expander was leaking.The final fill volume was 1210 cc and it was leaking after the past six fills.The replacement device was gel mentor memorygel breast implant 500cc.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|