| Catalog Number |
1012447-08 |
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
05/02/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Concomitant products: guide wire: sion blue, guide cath: hyperion jl4.The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined the reported difficulty appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.The mini trek and trek rx devices referenced are being filed under separate medwatch reports.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a moderately tortuous, concentric and heavily calcified left anterior descending (lad) artery that was 99% stenosed.Pre-dilatation at the mid lad was performed with a 1.2 x 6 mm mini trek balloon dilatation catheter (bdc).The first inflation was done at 10 atmospheres (atms), the second at 12 atms; however, the balloon ruptured during the third inflation at 12 atms.Therefore, a 2.5 x 15 mm trek bdc was used in the proximal lad and was inflated at 12 atms; however, the balloon ruptured during the second inflation at 14 atms.A 2.5 x 8 mm nc trek bdc was then used and inflated at 16 atms; however, the balloon ruptured at 18 atms during the second inflation.The devices did not meet any resistance with the anatomy during advancement.The 2.5 x 8 mm nc trek bdc was then replaced with a non-abbott bdc and a xience sierra stent was implanted to successfully complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|