|
|
| Catalog Number |
5950060 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Abscess (1690); Adhesion(s) (1695); Bacterial Infection (1735); Purulent Discharge (1812); Fistula (1862); Inflammation (1932); Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Disability (2371); Fungal Infection (2419)
|
| Date of Event |
06/28/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
There is no connection that can be made at this time between the reported unspecified post-operative complications and any problem with the bard/davol ventrio st device used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney did not allege a specific device failure or patient adverse event, and no medical records have been provided.Based on the limited information provided at this time, no conclusions can be made.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible at this time.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Note: the information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The following was alleged by the patient's attorney: on (b)(6) 2016: the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventrio st.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol ventrio st.As reported, the attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
There is no connection that can be made at this time between the reported unspecified post-operative complications and any problem with the bard/davol ventrio st device used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney did not allege a specific device failure or patient adverse event, and no medical records have been provided.Based on the limited information provided at this time, no conclusions can be made.No lot number has been provided; therefore a review of the manufacturing records is not possible at this time.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided: based on the additional information received, there is no change to the initial determination, no conclusions can be made.Per medical records review, about 1 year 1 month post implant of ventrio st, patient was diagnosed with bacterial infection, fungal infection, fistula, abscess, adhesions, purulent discharge and inflammation thereby underwent repair with mesh removal.The instructions-for-use supplied with the device list adhesions, infection, inflammation and fistula as possible complications.In regard to infection, the warnings section in ifu states, "if an infection develops, treat the infection aggressively.Consideration should be given regarding the need to remove the patch.An unresolved infection may require removal of the mesh." a review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.Note, the manufacturing date (15-may-2015) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The following was alleged by the patient's attorney: (b)(6) 2016: the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventrio st.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the bard/davol ventrio st.As reported, the attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient.¿ addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2016 - patient was diagnosed with multiple abdominal wall hernias thereby underwent laparoscopic and open repair with the implant of ventrio st.Per operative notes, ¿adhesions along the anterior abdominal wall was taken down.Multiple swiss cheese defect and small defect were noted and bowel loops closely adhered to the bowel wall.The defect was palpated easily, lysi s of adhesions were performed.The smaller hernia was closed using suture.A ventrio st mesh was placed inside the abdomen and up along the abdominal wall and secured circumferentially using tacks.¿ (b)(6) 2016 - patient had ventral fluid collection at surgical site and underwent drainage of fluid collection.Patient ir drain was turned bilious due to placement of tpn with picc line.(b)(6) 2016 - patient was diagnosed with enterocutaneous fistula thereby underwent open repair with the removal of fistula.Per operative notes, ¿fistula site was located just superior to umbilicus.Patient was noted to have a frozen abdomen.A small amount of pus with bile tinge was suctioned out.¿ (note: there was no mention/visualization of ventrio st mesh in this op notes) (b)(6) 2016 - patient had pain, migratory erythema on abdomen (b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with abscess, purulent discharge thereby underwent drainage of fluid.(b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with enterocutaneous fistula thereby underwent robotic assisted repair with the removal of adhesion, fistula and mesh.Per operative notes, ¿adhesion in anterior abdominal wall and enterocutaneous fistula were taken down.Adhesiolysis of the small bowel were done and loop of jejunum was fixed by small bowel resection.Mesentery was removed and closed the mesenteric defect.Mesh was removed from the abdominal wall.¿ attorney alleges that the patient had abscess, adhesions, fistulae, infection, mesh migration, pain, hernia recurrence and emotional injuries.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|