• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CASHEL TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CASHEL TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Model Number 466P306AU
Device Problem Failure to Align (2522)
Patient Problems Perforation of Vessels (2135); Bowel Perforation (2668)
Event Date 07/14/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint conclusion: as reported, the patient underwent placement of the trapease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damages to the patient including, but not limited to, tilting of the filter and perforation by the filter of the vena cava wall and small bowel.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, and pain and suffering, and other damages.The following additional information was received per the patient¿s implant records: the filter was implanted well below the renal veins due to pulmonary embolus and need to off anticoagulation for forthcoming gastric surgery.The patient tolerated the procedure well.According to the information received in the patient profile form (ppf), patient became aware of the reported events approximately five years and nine months post implantation.The patient also reports suffering from anxiety.The product was not returned for analysis.A review of the device history record revealed no anomalies during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported complaint.The inferior vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.The anxiety experienced by the patient does not represent a device malfunction.Anxiety, part of the body¿s natural response to stress and can cause feelings of nervousness, unease and worry.Without procedural films for review, the reported filter tilt could not be confirmed and the exact cause could not be determined.The timing and mechanism of the tilt has not been reported at this time.The brief also reported perforation of the ivc and small bowel; however, a clinical conclusion could not be determined as to the cause of the event.It is unknown if the tilt contributed to the reported perforation.A review of the instructions for use notes vessel damage such as intimal tears and perforation as procedural complications related it ivc filters.However, given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported event is related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Event Description
As reported by the legal department, the patient underwent placement of the trapease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damages to the patient including, but not limited to, tilting of the filter and perforation by the filter of the vena cava wall and small bowel.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, and pain and suffering, and other damages.The following additional information was received per the patient¿s implant records: the filter was implanted well below the renal veins due to pulmonary embolus and need to off anticoagulation for forthcoming gastric surgery.The patient tolerated the procedure well.According to the information received in the patient profile form (ppf), patient became aware of the reported events approximately five years and nine months post implantation.The patient also reports suffering from anxiety.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI
Type of Device
CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CASHEL
cahir road
cashel
co. tipperary
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORDIS CASHEL
cahir road
cashel
co. tipperary
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
karla castro
14201 nw 60th ave
miami lakes, FL 33014
MDR Report Key7544459
MDR Text Key109252073
Report Number1016427-2018-01486
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K020316
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/25/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/25/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2014
Device Model Number466P306AU
Device Catalogue Number466P306AU
Device Lot Number15388216
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/30/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured12/31/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age67 YR
-
-