• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE GÜNTHER TULIP VENA CAVA FILTER JUGULAR APPROACH; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE GÜNTHER TULIP VENA CAVA FILTER JUGULAR APPROACH; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-JP-JUG-TULIP
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Perforation (2205); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Date 05/01/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Catalog# igtcfs-65-jp-jug-tulip.Name and address for importer site: (b)(4).Similar to device under 510(k): k090140.(b)(4).Investigation is still in progress.
 
Event Description
Description of event according to initial reporter: ivc filter placement was performed.There was a tortuousity in the area between the punctured site(left jugular vein) and the ivc.The sheath system of the complaint igtcfs-65-jp-jug-tulip was advanced to the ivc using a wire guide (radifocus 35 / terumo) and a component dilator.Dilator and the wire guide were retrieved and then, the advancement of the filter introducer to the target site through the sheath was begun.During the delivery, slight resistance was encountered, but the physician continued pushing the introducer.When the resistance occurred, not the filter but the ivc was monitored through the fluoroscope.Since the introducer became impossible to push forward/pull back after the pushing, the physician shifted the monitoring area of fluoroscope to the vessel around the left jugular vein, confirming that the filter had perforated the sheath wall and penetrated the brachiocephalic vein.The physician pushed forward/pulled back the filter introducer with force, but the filter could not be retrieved.It detached from the grasping hook and was released then.Although gtrs was used in order to retrieve the released filter, the retrieval resulted in failure.Therefore, the left brachiocephalic vein was cut opened and the filter was retrieved out of the body surgically.Ivc filter placement was canceled.Patient outcome: although the patient¿s life was not threatened by this event, the hospitalization period was prolonged.Pe of the patient was not worsened due to the impossibility to place the filter.
 
Event Description
Description of event according to initial reporter: ivc filter placement was performed.There was a tortuousity in the area between the punctured site(left jugular vein) and the ivc.The sheath system of the complaint (b)(4) was advanced to the ivc using a wire guide (radifocus 35 / terumo) and a component dilator.Dilator and the wire guide were retrieved and then, the advancement of the filter introducer to the target site through the sheath was begun.During the delivery, slight resistance was encountered, but the physician continued pushing the introducer.When the resistance occurred, not the filter but the ivc was monitored through the fluoroscope.Since the introducer became impossible to push forward/pull back after the pushing, the physician shifted the monitoring area of fluoroscope to the vessel around the left jugular vein, confirming that the filter had perforated the sheath wall and penetrated the brachiocephalic vein.The physician pushed forward/pulled back the filter introducer with force, but the filter could not be retrieved.It detached from the grasping hook and was released then.Although gtrs was used in order to retrieve the released filter, the retrieval resulted in failure.Therefore, the left brachiocephalic vein was cut opened and the filter was retrieved out of the body surgically.Ivc filter placement was canceled.Patient outcome: although the patient¿s life was not threatened by this event, the hospitalization period was prolonged.Pe of the patient was not worsened due to the impossibility to place the filter.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Exemption number e2016032.William cook europe aps (manufacturer) is submitting this report on behalf of cook medical incorporated (cmi) (importer).Manufacturer ref# (b)(4).G1) name and address for importer site: (b)(4).Summary of investigational findings: investigation is based on event description, returned device, and imaging provided.The introducer, the sheath, the long, and the short dilator were returned, but no filter.On the sheath a severe penetration was noted approx.31.5cm from the tip.On the introducer the grasping hook was slightly straightened.An image review revealed the patient's anatomy was such that the junction between the left internal jugular vein and innominate vein resulted in a near 90° angle.The angle at the confluence of the left internal jugular vein and innominate vein facilitated the kinking of the deployment sheath and with continued forward pressure on the ivc filter, the filter perforated the side of the ivc filter deployment sheath, resulting in the filter extending through the sidewall of the sheath.Instead of stopping when resistance was encountered, the deploying physician continued to push forward/pull back the filter introducer with force, resulting in the filter perforating through the wall of the deployment sheath and the filter feet appearing to extend into the left subclavian and innominate vein.Under normal conditions the introducer sheath is strong enough to accomplish the procedure, but it may kink if excessive force is used to advance it through tortuous anatomy and the filter may be prone to exceed the sheath wall if advanced through a kinked sheath.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that it did not perform as intended.Cook medical will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GÜNTHER TULIP VENA CAVA FILTER JUGULAR APPROACH
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6
bjaeverskov 4632
DA  4632
MDR Report Key7551843
MDR Text Key109482140
Report Number3002808486-2018-00603
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
UDI-Device Identifier00827002037731
UDI-Public(01)00827002037731(17)191221(10)E3533958
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,o
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/06/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/30/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/21/2019
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-JP-JUG-TULIP
Device Lot NumberE3533958
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/16/2018
Distributor Facility Aware Date05/08/2018
Device Age16 MO
Date Manufacturer Received07/10/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-