|
The device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation.A relationship, if any, between the subject device and the reported event could not be determined since the product was not returned for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed because the device in question was not returned for evaluation.Thus, the complaint could not be verified, nor could a root cause be determined with confidence.Factors unrelated to the manufacture or design of the device that could have contributed to the reported event is patient's general health, following post-operative instructions, or the presence of coexisting medical problems.There were no indications during manufacturing record review that would suggest that the device did not meet product specifications upon release into distribution.
|