|
There is no patient involvement.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Reporter email address and phone number is unavailable.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.A device history records review has been requested.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Corrected data: hospital contact name, telephone, email, and occupation.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h4, h6: dhr review was completed.Part number: 389.102.Synthes lot number: a7pa18 (wo# (b)(4), wo# (b)(4)).Release to warehouse date: 05-may-2006 (wo# 90(b)(4)8530), 08-may-2006 (wo# (b)(4)).Manufacture site: tuttlingen.Part expiration date: n/a.List of nonconformance¿s: n/a.A review of the top level of the device history records showed that there were no issues at the time of manufacturing of this device that would contribute to the complaint condition.The dhr for sub component 218.0050, 220.0041 and 502.004 is no longer available due to the age of the instrument (over 12 years old).The traceability to the raw material lot number could not be established during this dhr review, due to the age of the instrument.No ncrs were generated during the production of this device.H3, h6: customer quality conducted an investigation of the returned device.The instrument was received with the reported condition of ¿broken (2+ pieces) pre or post operatively/step unknown: rm¿.The following investigation flow was performed: broken: the returned instrument was examined and the complaint condition was able to be confirmed as portions of the mount hinge on the short handle lower was found to be sheared off from the device (not returned) preventing the threaded spindle from being secured properly onto the device and the instrument from functioning as intended.The balance of the instrument is in fair condition.The received condition agrees with the complaint description and the complaint was confirmed.The cause of the issue could not be determined to be use error, misuse/abuse, non-compliance, postoperative trauma.Dimensional inspection was performed as below: drawings: feature specifications per drawings: length (center of dowel pin insertion hole to end of the threads): 51.05 +/-0.3 mm, diameter of dowel pin insertion hole: ø 3.1 +/- 0.05 mm, & diameter of mount hinge ø 2.99 + 0/- 0.02 mm.Calipers: length: 51.38 mm, diameter insertion hole: ø 3.07 mm, diameter mount hinge: ø 2.98 mm.The measured dimensions were found to be within the given specifications per the drawings referenced above.A device history review, was performed for the returned instrument¿s lot number and no mrrs, ncrs or complaint-related issues were identified with the lot number which may have contributed to the complaint condition.Relevant drawings for the returned device were reviewed (both current and from the time of manufacture): top-level drawing, components was reviewed and determined to be suitable for the intended design, application, and dimensional conformity when used and handled as recommended.While no definitive root cause could be determined it is likely that rough handling during sterile processing has led to the complaint condition.A material review could not be performed because the dhr for sub component 218.0050, 220.0041 and 502.004 is no longer available due to the age of the instrument (over 12 years old).The traceabilty to the raw material lot number could not be established during this dhr review, due to the age of the instrument.During the investigation, no product design or manufacturing issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|