| Model Number |
G56221 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Separation (1562)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
05/21/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that while maneuvering the flexor high-flex ansel guiding sheath via the femoral approach down the patient's vessel, it split.Two-thirds of the device could not be retrieved; therefore, the patient was sent to the hospital for surgical intervention.The remaining portion of the complaint device was successfully removed.It is not known if the patient's vasculature was tortuous, scarred, or calcified.There were no other devices being utilized inside the complaint device at the time of occurrence.The peripheral intervention procedure for which the patient was originally scheduled will have to be re-scheduled.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures other than removal of the complaint device portion due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.Refer to section findings.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation ¿ evaluation a review of the complaint history, device history record, documentation, drawing, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control of the device was conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.However, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record shows no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.It should be noted there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Based on the information provided, no product returned and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined.Measures are being conducted to address this failure mode.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This mdr is being submitted as having information not previously reported.Additional complaint investigation and record remediation was not performed.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|