• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA, INC. BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300 Back to Search Results
Model Number 300-20
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 04/12/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The neurologist had noted high impedance for patient's device.Patient underwent generator and lead revision due to high impedance.The explanted lead has not been received to date.
 
Event Description
The explanted lead and generator were received.Various electrical loads were attached to the pulse generator and results of diagnostic tests demonstrate that accurate resistance measurements were obtained in all instances.A comprehensive automated electrical evaluation showed that the pulse generator performed according to functional specifications.There were performance or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.During the visual analysis of the lead, electrode quadfilar coil appeared to be broken.Scanning electron microscopy was performed and identified the area as being mechanically damaged which prevented identification of the coil fracture type, no pitting and residual material on two of the broken coil strands.Residual material was observed on the coil surface.Scanning electron microscopy was performed on the other end and identified the area as being mechanically damaged which prevented identification of the coil fracture type, fine pitting and residual material on three of the broken coil strands.Pitting and residual material was observed on the coil surface.It is believed that stimulation was present for a certain period of time as evidenced by the presence of metal pitting.Low magnification sem analysis of the quadfilar coil shows characteristics typical of a lead discontinuity which may include: material fracture, rough or pitted surface, thinned material thickness, electro-etching or material dissolution.With the exception of the observed discontinuity the condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.No other obvious anomalies were noted.The setscrew marks found on the lead connector pins provide evidence that, at one point in time, a good mechanical and electrical connection was present.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed, during the visual analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIPOL LEAD MODEL 300
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key7574371
MDR Text Key110356733
Report Number1644487-2018-00969
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Medical Equipment Company Technician/Representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/14/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/06/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/31/2001
Device Model Number300-20
Device Lot Number19323C
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/19/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received07/19/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/08/1999
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age40 YR
-
-