As the lot number for the device was provided, a manufacturing review will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.(b)(4).The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
It was reported that during a mammographic-guided breast biopsy for a small cluster of calcifications, the marker allegedly failed to advance, failed to deploy, and afterwards failed to be removed from the probe.Reportedly, the patient was given more local anesthesia (lidocaine) and the probe and a portion of the marker were removed as one unit from the patient, while the cutter was open.Post procedure imaging indicated that a portion of the marker was allegedly sheared off by the cutter and now remains in the patient.There was no reported patient injury.
|