|
Catalog Number DL900F |
Device Problems
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Extrusion (2934); Material Deformation (2976); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 11/22/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a manufacturing review could not be performed.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for detachment and perforation as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the filter.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the litigation process that approximately three years five months post vena cava filter deployment a ct scan demonstrated the filter detached and perforated beyond the ivc wall.There were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism and in conjunction with or before orthopedic procedure.Approximately three years five months post vena cava filter deployment a computed tomography scan demonstrated the filter detached and perforated beyond the inferior vena cava.At some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that the filter struts bent.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The detached struts are located beyond the walls of the inferior vena cava posteriorly encroaching upon l3 vertebra.The patient experienced back pain; however, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process, and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.The medical records included images.The image review was documented in the medical records.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately three years and five months later, computed tomography (ct) revealed that several filter struts located beyond the walls of the inferior vena cava.There was no involvement of adjacent organs or vessels.However, a minor bending of several of the inferior vena cava filter struts was noted.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for alleged perforation of the inferior vena cava (ivc) and material deformation.However, the investigation is inconclusive for filter limb detachment.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.H10: (expiry date: 03/2017).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism and in conjunction with or before orthopedic procedure.Approximately three years five months post vena cava filter deployment a computed tomography scan demonstrated the filter detached and perforated beyond the inferior vena cava.Additionally, the filter struts bent.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The detached struts are located beyond the walls of the inferior vena cava posteriorly encroaching upon l3 vertebra.The patient experienced back pain; however, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|