|
COOK ENDOSCOPY ACROBAT® 2 CALIBRATED TIP WIRE GUIDE; OCY, ENDOSCOPIC GUIDEWIRE, GASTROENTEROLOGY-UROLOGY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
G47616 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Perforation (2001)
|
| Date of Event |
05/17/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Concomitant medical products: sphincterotome, unknown make or model.Investigation evaluation: a product evaluation was not performed in response to this report because the product said to be involved was not provided to cook for evaluation.The report could not be confirmed.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: as reported by the physician, the patient's condition "diverticulum, stones, and aged tissue" contributed to the perforation by the wire guide.A device failure was not alleged.The instructions for use include the following: "potential adverse events associated with ductal cannulation and bridging of structures include, but are not limited to: perforation, pancreatitis, bleeding, or tissue inflammation." prior to distribution, all acrobat® 2 calibrated tip wire guide are subjected to a visual inspection and functional testing to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted and this represents an isolated occurrence.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
During an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp), the physician used a cook acrobat® 2 calibrated tip wire guide.The following was initially reported: the wire bent within the procedure and perforated the papilla laterally [from the inside].The following further information was received regarding this event: the papilla was lifted with the sphincterotome and cannulated with the wire guide.The wire was advanced under fluoroscopy, and then it ¿snapped into a loop¿ and perforated the papilla from the inside.Cannulation was difficult and the patient had a diverticulum near the papilla.The patient also had stones that caused difficulty with cannulation.There was no intervention or additional procedures performed due to the perforation.The perforation was a ¿microperforation¿ and it did not require any further treatment, hemostasis, or other procedures.The physician is unsure if the tip of the wire guide came through to the duodenum and fully perforated the tissue.The physician¿s thoughts are that the microperforation would have happened with any wire guide, due to the patient¿s conditions (diverticulum, stones, and aged tissue).The physician also reported that they continued with the sphincterotomy and stone removal procedure.The following question was asked to the physician involved, "does the physician believe that wire guide caused or was contributory to the perforation? and answered, "no." while the physician stated that it was not an issue of the wire guide and that this event would have happened with every other wire guide, a cook awg2-35-450 was used during a procedure where a microperforation occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
During an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp), the physician used a cook acrobat® 2 calibrated tip wire guide.The following was initially reported: the wire bent within the procedure and perforated the papilla laterally [from the inside].The following further information was received regarding this event: the papilla was lifted with the sphincterotome and cannulated with the wire guide.The wire was advanced under fluoroscopy, and then it ¿snapped into a loop¿ and perforated the papilla from the inside.Cannulation was difficult and the patient had a diverticulum near the papilla.The patient also had stones that caused difficulty with cannulation.There was no intervention or additional procedures performed due to the perforation.The perforation was a ¿microperforation¿ and it did not require any further treatment, hemostasis, or other procedures.The physician is unsure if the tip of the wire guide came through to the duodenum and fully perforated the tissue.The physician¿s thoughts are that the microperforation would have happened with any wire guide, due to the patient¿s conditions (diverticulum, stones, and aged tissue).The physician also reported that they continued with the sphincterotomy and stone removal procedure.The following question was asked to the physician involved, "does the physician believe that wire guide caused or was contributory to the perforation?" and answered, "no." while the physician stated that it was not an issue of the wire guide and that this event would have happened with every other wire guide, a cook awg2-35-450 was used during a procedure where a microperforation occurred.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient experienced a microperforation due to patient conditions.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation evaluation: our laboratory evaluation of the product said to be involved was unable to confirm the clinical complications during placement due to the limitations of a laboratory setting, but was able to confirm the wire guide was bent.The report indicates "the wire bent within the procedure and perforated the papilla laterally." the wire was returned with a two (2) bends in the distal end of the wire.The bends were located at one (1) cm and at twenty (20) cm on the distal end of the wire.The bends were characteristic of a wire guide that had been used during a procedure.No other anomalies were detected with the device.The device history record for the lot number said to be involved was reviewed.A discrepancy or anomaly was not observed with the product that was released for distribution.Investigation conclusion: a definitive cause for this observation could not be determined because the actual use conditions could not be duplicated in the laboratory setting.Due to a variety of clinical conditions such as patient anatomy, endoscope position or progression of disease state, we could not reproduce the actual conditions of product usage during our laboratory analysis.This limits our ability to conclusively determine a cause.As supported by the physician, the patient's condition "diverticulum, stones, and aged tissue" contributed to the perforation by the wire guide.A device failure was not identified.The instructions for use includes the following: "potential adverse events associated with ductal cannulation and bridging of structures include, but are not limited to: perforation, pancreatitis, bleeding, or tissue inflammation." prior to distribution, all acrobat® 2 calibrated tip wire guide are subjected to a visual inspection and functional testing to ensure device integrity.A review of the device history record confirmed that the lot said to be involved met all manufacturing requirements prior to shipment.Corrective action: a review of the complaint history was conducted and this represents an isolated occurrence.The likelihood of occurrence is considered rare.Corrective action is not warranted at this time based on the quality engineering risk assessment.Quality assurance will continue to monitor for complaint trends and reassess the risk assessment results as post market feedback continues to become available.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|