|
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SÃ RL CH CONCORDE LIFT DRIVER SHAFT; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
2878-04-101 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).One (1) concorde lift driver shaft was returned for evaluation visual examination at the microscopic level revealed a fractured tip at the distal end of the driver.The second half of the tip was not provided for analysis.An optical image of the fractured surface reveals plastic deformation on the top right and bottom left corners along with torsional shear markings following a circular pattern.The plastic deformation of the tip indicates a torsional overload.This suggests the driver underwent a quasi-static overload torsional shear failure starting at the ends of the driver that extended to the center of the shaft, the potential fracture termination site.The location of plastic deformation is also consistent with the driver failing while rotating in a counterclockwise direction.This indicates a failure in the collapsing direction of the expandable cage.A device history record review did not reveal any issues that could have cause or contributed to the reported event.All complaint trends will be evaluated as a part of the depuy spine monthly complaint review meeting.A definitive root cause for the fractured tip of the concorde lift driver shaft cannot be determined with certainty.However, fracture analysis of the returned driver suggests that driver underwent a quasi-static overload torsional shear failure starting at the ends of the driver that extended to the center of the shaft, the potential fracture termination site.No issues were identified in the manufacturing and release of this device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer, as such this complaint will be closed with no further action required.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
We were doing an l4-5, l3-4 tlif.Our standard technique is to trial until we cannot pull it out using opal trials.We trialed to 10 and always go up one on the cage.So we would use an 11 opal.We put the expandable in and expanded hoping to torque out at 11mm.It torqued out at the first line.We collapsed and pulled it out.He decided to use an opal at this level and use the expandable at the second level.I had the tech expand it to the first line and measure it out to see if it was close to 11mm.It measured 10.The tech collapsed it back down.We went to use it on the second level and the driver tip was stuck in the end.I feel the tech broke it off when collapsing the cage, but didn't tell me.I watched it expand.As to why it torqued out early on the first line, we could have been riding over the top of the crushed cancellous and autograft that we pack the disc space with shortening the disc height.The hospital also is making us use a medtronic bone mill that doesnt crush the bone very well and its possible the tech put a larger piece in the cage to start and it wedged the gear enough to prevent it from opening more without torquing.There are a number of variables going on.However, i watched the surgeon collapse the cage insitu and watched the tech expand the cage after it was removed.I believe it snapped when the tech was collapsing it back down to zero, but he never told me.Patient consequence? no.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|