(b)(4).To date, the device has not been returned.If the product is returned for evaluation, any further information derived from the evaluation will be submitted in a supplemental 3500a form.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: what is the initial procedure date? 04/09/2018 how was the prineo adhesive applied on the mesh? yes what date did the reaction occur on? patient re-admitted on 05/11/2018 for hip abscess.Per nursing staff, at that time prineo was still in place and was ¿dirty¿.Was there any medical or surgical intervention performed (product removed; re-operation; re-closure; prescription steroids; antibiotics prescribed)? if so, please clarify.Pt was taken back to or on several occasions for i&ds and cultures.Patient has been on iv abx and has had 2 re-admissions since the original surgery.Can you identify the lot number of the product that was used? dermabond prineo 22cm clr222us.What is the most current patient status? currently, patient is admitted and receiving iv abx and has a wound vac.Patient demographics: initials / id; age or date of birth; bmi; gender; patient pre-existing medical conditions (i.E.Allergies, history of reactions) 74 yo m; bmi=29.21; past medical hx: arthritis, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension; allergies to adhesive tape & latex per chart.
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a total hip arthroplasty on 4/09/2018 and topical skin adhesive was used to close the incisions.The patient returned to the hospital with very dirty topical skin adhesive on the skin, showing a surgical site infection.The patient was readmitted on (b)(6) 2018 for hip abscess.The patient was taken back to the or on several occasions for i&d's and cultures.Patient has been on iv antibiotics and has had two re-admissions since the original surgery.Currently, the patient is admitted and receiving iv antibiotics and has a wound vac.Additional information has been requested.
|