|
Outcomes attributed to adverse event: required intervention to prevent permanent impairment/damage (devices).Additional information: date of event: on (b)(6) 2018.Event: additional information was received on 22jun2018 stating the following: device was being used for tube feeding.Not sure if any difficulties with insertion- that would be in ir, nothing documented on insertion record to indicate difficulties noted suture was embedded in skin on removal of tube- suture was not broken device was placed on (b)(6) 2017, and removed on (b)(6) 2018 due to constant g tube site pain device was removed by writer (rn) as per usual, string cut on external tube, tube was straightened as much as possible, and tube twisted out of tract.Patient pain subsided once g tube and retained string removed.No further planned interventions.Implant date: on (b)(6) 2017; explant date: on (b)(6) 2018.Device evaluated by mfg: no; conclusion not yet available-evaluation in progress (11).This report includes information known at this time. a follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information has previously been reported, is unknown or is unavailable.Investigation evaluation: a review of the complaint history, drawings, device history record, documentation, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, specifications, trends, quality control, and visual inspection of the returned device was conducted during the investigation.The reported device was returned for evaluation.Visual inspection found the device curved, suture black/blue and catheter yellow/brown in color indicating use.The suture was not connected to the pig tail and measured 13cm long from the catheter.The sleeve was not provided and it is unknown if it was used or not.The suture is intended to be secured with the device sleeve.A document-based investigation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the finished product was not made to specifications.Review of the device history record of the finished product shows zero nonconforming events that could contribute to this failure mode.A complaint history search revealed that there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Based on the information provided, examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, a definite root cause could not be determined.Potentially, patient anatomy, manipulation of the device while in use, use technique, manufacturing non-conformance, or lack of strict adherence to the ifu (not tightening or properly securing the suture) could have contributed to this event.Per the [quality engineering] risk assessment, no further action is required.Monitoring will continue to be performed for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|