• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE RUBICON¿ 35; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE RUBICON¿ 35; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS Back to Search Results
Model Number H74939240035131
Device Problem Hole In Material (1293)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/30/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age at time of event: over 60.(b)(4).Device evaluated by mfr: the device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Same case as: 2134265-2018-05473.It was reported that the guidewire perforated a hole in the catheter.The target lesion was located in the right and left common iliac/aorta.An amplatz super stiff guidewire, zipwire hydrophilic guide wire, starter guidewire and a non-bsc wire were selected for use.During the procedure, the first 135cm rubicon¿ 35 was flushed with saline and an attempt to pass the catheter from the right common iliac over to the left common iliac was made; however the device was getting "hang-up" and the anatomy was noted to be very difficult.The catheter would not track and became difficult to remove over the zipwire hydrophilic guide wire.The rubicon and the wire were removed.A second 135cm rubicon¿ 35 was selected for use with the same zipwire and amplatz super stiff guidewire used with the first rubicon device.It was noted that the amplatz wire felt different and perforated through the middle of the catheter about three quarters down and did not come out the end hole.The rubicon was removed.A bsc bern catheter and a non-bsc catheter were also selected for use.A wire and the bern catheter were successfully used to access the superficial femoral artery.Balloon angioplasty was performed of the left superficial femoral artery.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status if fine.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBICON¿ 35
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE
one scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer Contact
sonali arangil
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key7615084
MDR Text Key111555013
Report Number2134265-2018-05472
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K122394
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/30/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/28/2021
Device Model NumberH74939240035131
Device Catalogue Number39240-03513
Device Lot Number21927608
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/30/2018
Initial Date FDA Received06/19/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/29/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
GUIDEWIRE: ROSEN
-
-