The causes of re-operation for a failed annuloplasty repairs are well documented in the literature.Re-operations are primarily the result of a progression of disease or technical failures and are not related to product malfunctions.Unlike prosthetic heart valves, annuloplasty rings are an adjunct to the valve repair.In this case, the patient required intervention as the size of the implanted ring was a bit too small for the long term.Based on the available information, the root cause for the event was likely due to patient related factors and procedural factors.The device history record (dhr) was not able to be reviewed as the device serial number was not provided.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.[(b)(4)].
|
Edwards reviewed the article, "mitral valve repair for pure mitral regurgitation followed years later by mitral valve replacement for mitral stenosis" by tiffany m.Becker et al.Abstract - we describe herein 2 patients who developed severe mitral stenosis (ms) approximately two decades after a mitral valve repair operation for pure mitral regurgitation (mr) secondary to mitral valve prolapse.This report s purpose is to point ¿ out that use of a circumferential mitral annular ring during the repair has the potential to produce a transmitral pressure gradient just like that occurring after mitral valve replacement utilizing a mechanical prosthesis or a bioprosthesis in the mitral position.Within this article, the following complaint was identified: 1 mitral ring explant after an approximate implant duration of 21 years due to severe mitral stenosis.A non-edwards mechanical valve was implanted in replacement.The author alleged the size of the implanted ring was "a bit too small for the long term"."focal fibrous thickening of the leaflets due to constant abnormal contact" was noted.
|