|
Catalog Number RBYPODJ30 |
Device Problems
Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Physical Resistance (2578); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 05/21/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The pull wire was completely retracted out of the distal detachment tip (ddt) embolization coil was detached from its pusher assembly.The embolization coil with the constraint sphere intact was stuck on the distal end of the non-penumbra snare.Conclusions: evaluation of the podj revealed that the pull wire was completely retracted out of the ddt and the embolization coil was detached from its pusher assembly.If the pull wire is retracted out of the ddt, the embolization coil will detach from its pusher assembly.The pet lock on the proximal end of the pusher assembly was damaged, but not broken.The root cause of the pull wire being retracting out of the ddt could not be determined.The complaint further stated that the embolization coil was bunching up inside the hub of the lantern.If the introducer sheath is not properly aligned within the hub of the lantern, damage such as the embolization coil bunching up inside the hub of the catheter may occur.The lantern identified in the complaint was not returned to penumbra for evaluation.Penumbra coils and catheters are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2018-01234.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using pod packing coils (podjs).During the procedure, the physician successfully deployed and detached four podjs using a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).The physician then attempted to place another podj, however, experienced resistance while advancing the podj was partially within the lantern.It was reported that the podj was bunching up at the hub of the lantern.The physician therefore removed the podj and retracted the podj back into its introducer sheath on the back table.The physician then re-inserted the same podj into the patient; however, as the physician was advancing the podj into the target location the podj unintentionally detached.The physician was able to remove the detached podj by using a snare device and the procedure was completed using a new lantern and two additional podjs.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|