Customer indicated that scope did not malfunction and there was no physical issue with it.The sem-rigid scope was returned for microbial testing, since customer believes that scope may have been involved with a patient infection.The rigid endoscope (serial no.(b)(4)) was received one (b)(6) 2018 at karl storz logistic center in (b)(4).Once received, the channels of the endoscope were sampled by performing a flush-brush-flush technique with sterile water and a new cleaning brush to recover any potential contamination inside the device.The sterile water from the channels was collected in a sterile sample cup and a negative control sample was prepared using the same lot of sterile water, cleaning brush, and a sample cup.The sample from the device was labeled as "(b)(4)" while the negative control sample was labeled as "(b)(4)".The samples were then shipped to nelson labs for microbial analysis.Membrane filtration of the samples yielded no detectable colony forming units (cfus).Therefore, no contamination was detected within the channels of the rigid endoscope.
|
Allegedly, the doctor performed a ureteroscopy with left laser lithotripsy and stent placement on a patient.Post procedure, the patient was experiencing fever and chills.Patient went to the er and was found to have an infection and was treated with augmentin- antibiotics.As per the hospital, the patient is recovering well.
|