| Model Number |
G49043 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Separation (1562)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
06/06/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) number: pre-amendment.(b)(4).This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported, during recanalization of the patient's calcified superficial femoral artery (sfa), the tip of the flexor high-flex ansel guiding sheath broke and became lodged in the patient's anatomy.An incision was made in the patient's leg in order to retrieve the separated portion of the complaint device.The retrieval was successful and the patient reportedly was "ok" after the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due after the retrieval of the broken device component.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation ¿ evaluation.A review of the dimensional verification, complaint history, device history record, drawing, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, quality control, and a visual inspection of the returned devices were conducted during the investigation.The visual inspection of the returned device confirmed that the distal portion of the tubing separated from the rest of the device.Elongation is present at approximately 32.0cm from the proximal hub continuing to the separation site.The separation site appears frayed , and exposed coil extends 52.0cm in length from the distal end of the proximal section of tubing.The exposed coil is wrapped around the dilator and wire guide, with the dilator extending 11.7cm from the separation site and the wire extending 52.7cm.A bend in the dilator is noted at 6.0cm from the separation site.The wire extends 41.1 cm out of the distal tip of the dilator.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record showed the lot was released meeting all finished goods release criteria.It should be noted there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Based on the information provided, the examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, the root cause was determined to be related to a device component issue.Measures are being conducted to address this failure mode.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.Refer to section h10 for investigation findings.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information regarding patient and/or event details has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This mdr is being submitted as having information not previously reported.Additional complaint investigation and record remediation was not performed.Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|