A review of the device history record was performed and no concerns were found.The device has not been returned for evaluation and no images or videos have been provided of the filter in-vivo, so the complaint cannot be confirmed.If additional information is provided in the future, this issue will be reevaluated as needed.
|
According to the notice received by way of a civil action complaint filed on may 16, 2018, the patient was prescribed and implanted with an option retrievable ivc filter on or about (b)(6) 2011 by dr.(b)(6) at (b)(6) medical center in (b)(6).The patient had a scheduled retrieval approximately 6 years later, on or about (b)(6) 2017 by dr.(b)(6) at (b)(6), main campus in (b)(6).The filter was partially retrieved and the plaintiff alleges the filter, tilted, embedded, fractured and perforated as well as ¿incomplete removal of the ivc filter with one filter leg and two filter arms remaining in plaintiff¿s body.Interaction of the filter struts with organs, blood vessels, and structures, including limitation the aorta, duodenum and spine.The retained struts subject plaintiff to the ongoing risk of complications and injury.Plaintiff has also suffered noneconomic damages including without limitation pain, suffering, emotional distress and loss of enjoyment of life.¿ argon¿s attorneys are attempting to gather additional information.
|