|
Catalog Number UNKNOWN G2 |
Device Problems
Extrusion (2934); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a manufacturing review could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instruction for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately eight years post vena cava filter deployment, the filter allegedly perforated into the vena cava wall.Reportedly, the filter has not been retrieved yet.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately eight years post vena cava filter deployment, the filter allegedly perforated into the vena cava wall.Reportedly, the filter has not been retrieved yet.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review:a complete manufacturing review could not be conducted for the investigation as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary:the device was not returned for evaluation.Images and medical records were not provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for perforation of the ivc as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the filter.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.(b)(4).The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|