|
No medical records or medical images have been made available to the manufacturer.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Manufacturing review: the device history record has been reviewed, and during review of the manufacturing process for the balloon there was no manufacturing related cause found for the reported event.Investigation summary: the device returned was one 16 fr tri-funnel repl gastrostomy feeding tube.The device showed signs of use.Visual, microscopic, tactile, and functional testing were performed.The balloon had a burst near the center and the balloon membrane showed stretch marks and evidence of tearing with a relatively rough surface and sharp edges.There was abundant delamination of layers of the balloon material and significant material stretching immediately around the burst.The complaint of a deflation of the balloon is confirmed and found more specifically to be due to a balloon burst.The complaint of a balloon rupture is confirmed, and while a definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information, procedural issues may have contributed to this event.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|