|
Catalog Number RF310F |
Device Problems
Malposition of Device (2616); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Extrusion (2934)
|
Patient Problems
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/19/2010 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.This is the only event reported to date for this lot number and failure mode.Medical record review: vena cava filter was placed at l1 secondary to open book pelvic fracture and multiple spinal fractures.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Images were not provided for review.Medical records were provided and reviewed.There was no specific deficiency alleged in the provided medical records.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for tilt and perforation as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the filter.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.Expiry date: 09/2011; manufacture date: 09/2008.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient in conjunction with or before orthopedic procedure and in conjunction with trauma situation/motor vehicle accident.At some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that filter struts perforated into organs and the filter tilted and embedded in the wall of the ivc.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process, and quality control testing.This lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately, one year and five months of post deployment, computed tomography of abdomen and pelvis showed an inferior vena cava filter oriented approximately 45-degree angle to the inferior vena cava with the head of the filter pointing towards the patient¿s right side.The head of the filter appeared to be located within the right renal vein.Several of the prongs of the filter exit through the wall of the inferior vena cava to the left and anteriorly.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the perforation of the inferior vena cava (ivc) and filter tilt.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.D4 (expiry date: 09/2011).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient in conjunction with or before orthopedic procedure; in conjunction with trauma situation/motor vehicle accident.At some time post filter deployment, it was alleged that the filter struts perforated into the organs and the filter tilted and was embedded in wall of the inferior vena cava.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.The status of the patient is unknown.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|