• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US EXPRESSEW III W/HOOK; SUTURE/NEEDLE PASSER, REUSABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US EXPRESSEW III W/HOOK; SUTURE/NEEDLE PASSER, REUSABLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 214124
Device Problems Bent (1059); Partial Blockage (1065); Failure to Advance (2524)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual observations revealed that the right side of the upper jaw hook was bent inwards.This type of failure could be attributed to blunt force impact; potential root causes include the device hitting bone during a procedure or the device being mishandled.When attempting to load a test needle in the needle tray, the needle could not fully be seated, there could be a blockage preventing the needle to fully enter the needle tray, confirming this complaint.Via functional test, when the trigger was actuated, the jaws did not function properly.The jaws did close or open successfully, however the jaw to shaft pin was intact.There two possible root causes for this type of functional failure: there is excess surgical debris jammed in the gun, or since the upper jaw was bent from blunt force impact there is a possibility that the internal mechanism of the jaw was damaged.Other than the possible root causes listed a specific root cause couldn¿t be determined at this time.The dhr review indicated that this batch of devices was processed without incident; therefore, there is no evidence of manufacturing anomalies on the records reviewed.Furthermore, a related complaint search in depuy synthes mitek complaints system revealed no complaints of any type for this lot of devices that was released to distribution.And at this time no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported to the repair that there was difficulty with needle sliding through.Additional information received via email from the sales rep on 10-3-2017.Only information provided was: ¿difficulty with needle sliding through¿.There is no other information.There was no operating room incident report filed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EXPRESSEW III W/HOOK
Type of Device
SUTURE/NEEDLE PASSER, REUSABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer lawrence
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5089776860
MDR Report Key7659657
MDR Text Key113337790
Report Number1221934-2018-52892
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LXH
UDI-Device Identifier10886705003655
UDI-Public10886705003655
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/03/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/03/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number214124
Device Lot Number32557-150602
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/11/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/03/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/04/2015
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-