• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 37601
Device Problems Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/14/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
See report # 3004209178-2018-14186 for other implantable neurostimulator involved in this event.Analysis results for the returned implantable neurostimulator were not available at the time of this report.A follow-up report will be sent when analysis is complete.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a healthcare provider (hcp) via a manufacture representative (rep) regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).It was reported the lead was damaged during the extraction procedure on (b)(6) 2018.No environmental/external/patient factor were thought to have led or contributed to the issue.It was reported testing on the lead was done with a testing cable.All contacts showed open circuits.The physician made multiple attempts to resolve the issue by disconnecting/reconnection and testing with the clinician programmer.The physician requested a new extension and battery to try to restore therapy for the patient.The issue was resolved at the time of the report.The patient was alive without injury at the time of the report.No further complications were reported or anticipated.Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative.It was reported the patient requested another battery be opened.It was opened, not used, and returned to the manufacturer where analysis will be performed.It was reported the ins was removed because they were questioning the functionality of battery.The physician requested the battery be tested for functionality due to high impedances.The patient recovered without sequela.Additional information was received from the health care professional (hcp) via the manufacturer representative.It was clarified the explant procedure occurred on (b)(6) 2018 and the re-implant of the extensions and ins was done on (b)(6) 2018.It was reported after dissecting the lead and reconnecting the lead to the extension connection, there were open circuits.The distal end of the lead seemed to be frayed per the physician which was believed to be the cause of the open circuits.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Due to imdrf harmonization, some previously submitted device, method, result, and conclusion codes related to this event may have been updated.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from a manufacturer representative (rep).It was clarified the hcp requested to switch out the extension first thinking it could have been a faulty extension.Then they requested to try another battery.The damage to the lead occurred while dissecting the leads and removing the boot and disconnection the lead/extension connection during the reimplant.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis results of the implantable neurostimulator (serial # (b)(4)) and the extension (serial# (b)(4)) revealed no anomalies.Good impedance was observed.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received indicating they were having difficulty getting therapy turned back on and the hcp thought it might be a broken lead.It was noted that the rep did a "programming trick" and was able to get it working.It was noted that the last 3-4 months they have been having trouble again with the right stm lead.An oor occurs when they program the right stn lead, this has been an ongoing issue since implant.Impedances were out of range on 0, 1, 8, 10 at greater than 2000 ohms.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACTIVA
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7664029
MDR Text Key113234071
Report Number3004209178-2018-15055
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MHY
UDI-Device Identifier00643169864191
UDI-Public00643169864191
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P960009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/22/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/05/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/28/2019
Device Model Number37601
Device Catalogue Number37601
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/27/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/22/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/05/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age59 YR
-
-