| Model Number |
PCB00 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse (1254); Material Deformation (2976)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
04/17/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Explant date: if explanted; give date: not applicable (n/a) as the lens remains implanted and therefore not explanted.(b)(4).Device evaluation: the product testing could not be performed as the product was not returned.The reported complaint cannot be confirmed.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing process record was evaluated and no deviation was found during process related to the complaint issue reported.There was no discrepancy found during the mrr (manufacturing record review).The product was manufactured and released according to the specifications.A search revealed that no additional complaints for this production order have been received.Labeling review: the directions for use (dfu) was reviewed.The dfu adequately provides instructions and precautions for the proper use and handling of the product.Conclusion: based on the investigation results there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A reported was received from a patient complaining of double vision after the intraocular lens (iol) implantation in the left eye (os) on (b)(6) 2018.Reportedly, the issue began 3-4 days post-operation.It was noted that the patient's pre-op measurement was 20/25 +2.00 and the post-op measurement on (b)(6) 2018 was 20/30 +1.00.Refraction was done on the same day with the trial frame, and then the patient was not experiencing double vision anymore; his measurement was 20/15.Additional information revealed that there was no patient injury and no secondary surgical intervention was required.Patient stated that the surgeon noticed that the iol had a crease in it so it didn't unfold correctly.Consequently, the patient discussed any options with his surgeon who advised that glasses would take care of the double vision.The patient also reported having glare, but the surgeon did not address that issue.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This correction mdr is being submitted to address inaccurate information in section f on the xml version of the previous submission caused by a software glitch in the transmission process.The internal non-conformance numbers for this software issue are (b)(4) and capa-(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|