| Catalog Number |
03.008.009 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Failure to Align (2522)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
06/12/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Patient information is unknown.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Reporter email address is unknown.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.A device history records review has been requested.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient underwent a hindfoot nail arthrodesis case and foot surgery on (b)(6) 2018.During the procedure, the aiming arm and insertion handle were being used in the hindfoot fusion case, and the aiming arm and insertion handle missed the proximal locking holes in the nail during proximal locking.It is unknown if there was a surgical delay.The surgery was successfully completed.Patient outcome is unknown.This report is for an aiming arm for ti cann hindfoot arthrodesis nail-ex.This is report 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional narrative: device history records review was completed for part# 03.008.009, lot# 1899021.Manufacturing location: (b)(4), release to warehouse date: jun 11, 2008.The device history record shows this lot of devices was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework or nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual and functional criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacturing process.Review of the device history records showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Product development investigation was completed.Visual inspection of the returned device under 10x magnification at customer quality (cq) revealed no major damage to any feature of the aiming arm.A few minor nicks were noted in areas not critical to function.Assembly with the returned insertion handle (03.008.007/lot 1588091) revealed no visually apparent alignment issues.The devices were able to be assembled properly, no excessive toggling was observed, and the insertion handle was able to rotate without issue.Functional testing could not be completed as the nail and threaded alignment pin (pin) were not returned.The technique guide instructs to tighten the pin once the aiming arm is set to the proper orientation.The received condition does not agree with the complaint description.The complaint could not be replicated during investigation.Dimensions of the insertion handle¿s features relevant to the complaint condition were measured.The distances from the aiming arm base to the four proximal locking holes were 240.32mm (¿180 & 240¿) 214.01mm (¿dynamic¿), 207.01mm (¿static¿), and 180.28mm (¿150¿) (ca472).These were within specification: 240mm, 213.5mm, 206.5mm, 180mm +/-1.2 (respectively) per relevant drawings.The holes¿ diameters were measured to be 12.00mm, which were within specification at 12.00mm +0.036 per drawing.Aiming arm drawings were reviewed during this investigation.No product design issues or discrepancies were observed.The complaint condition could not be confirmed during investigation.There were no issues during the manufacture of this product that would contribute to this complaint condition.During the investigation, no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Visual and dimensional inspection revealed no major damage or non-conforming dimensions that would lead to the complaint condition.Functional testing could not be completed as the nail and pin involved in the event were not returned.It is possible the complaint condition was due to a nail issue, a pin issue, or a product-use issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Date device returned to manufacturer.The subject device has been received and the product evaluation is in progress.No conclusion can be drawn.A review of the device history records has been requested and is currently pending completion.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|