| Catalog Number |
685G |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The device history records were reviewed and the manufacturing criteria was met prior to the release of this lot.The product upon which this medwatch is based has been received, however, the product evaluation is not yet complete.Any further information derived from the evaluation will be submitted in a supplemental 3500a form.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported during a procedure on (b)(6) 2018 a suture was used.While pulling the suture through the tissue the needle came off the suture and fell into the patient.After 30 to 45 minutes the needle was recovered.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse consequences for the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # = > pc-000211616 date sent to the fda: 08/10/2018 device evaluation summary: an unopened sample of product code 685, lot leh857 was returned for analysis.During the visual inspection of the sample, no defects were found on the package.The sample was opened, and the swage and attachment area were as expected.The suture was dispensed without problems and examined along of the strand and no defects were observed.A functional test was performed, and the pull force were above the minimum requirements.Per the conditions of the sample received, no attachment defects were found and the tested sample met the finished goods requirements.A used needle was returned for analysis.A fracture was observed at the suture attachment of the needle.The needle was received in two pieces, only one of the mating fracture surfaces was examined for this evaluation.The fracture surfaces were examined microscopically in multiple locations in order to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile overload failure.This was a ductile fracture.The evidence of this examination indicates that the breakage occurred at the attachment area of the needle during use due to tensile overload.There is no evidence of any material flaw or defect that would cause premature failure.In order to avoid this kind of damage grasp the needle in an area one-third (1/3) to one-half (1/2) of the distance from the attachment end to the point.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|