| Model Number |
E2516HS |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
06/25/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, during a procedure, the device broke in two pieces.Nothing fell into patient cavity.There was no patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Evaluation summary: post market vigilance led an investigation into the reported complaint in conjunction with engineering.One device was received for evaluation.This device had been used in the treatment or diagnosis of a patient.Without the original packaging or a reported lot number, the investigator cannot determine if the product was within the assigned expiration date at the time of reported incident.The returned product did not meet specification as received.Visual inspection found that the device was separated into halves at the ultrasonic bond.The reported condition was confirmed.The investigation found that the device separated into two halves along the ultrasonic bond line.Engineering confirmed pencil housings were un-welded.There is no lot number.Without the lot number there is no record of when produced and therefore no further research of the record possible.There are two procedures in place to identify an under-welded pencil.The welding equipment is programmed with minimum energy limits and alarms the under welded condition to alert operator.Also, product is 100% visually inspected for quality.This pencil was accepted with insufficient weld strength.This pencil should have been rejected by the welder and operator.A weak weld is isolated and rare.The pencil was not used in a procedure.The investigation identified the root cause of the reported event to be manufacturing.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|