|
Concomitant devices: cook pva-300, cook hnb5 0-38-100-p-ns-sim1, terumo 2.5french microcatheter.Pma/510(k) number = pre-amendment.(b)(4).This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
|
|
It was reported, during a trans femoral artery tumor embolization procedure, the proximal end of two needles from two performer introducers bent.During the process of puncturing the access site, the first needle bent at the proximal end.A second complaint device was utilized which also bent at the proximal end while puncturing the site.Finally, a third performer introducer needle was used and the procedure was successfully completed.According to the complainant, additional information is not available from the facility.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s anatomy.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence nor were any additional procedures required.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation ¿ evaluation.A review of the complaint history, device history record, drawing, instructions for use, manufacture instructions, and quality control of the returned device were conducted during the investigation.It should also be noted that the rcfn-5.-35-j devices are sets that contain a 5.0fr sheath and dilator, 0.035" wire guide, and an 18 gage needle.This is investigation focuses on the needle as that is the component involved in the reported failure.In place of needle evaluations, the standard to which the needle cannula material is tested will be referenced.The round stainless steel tubing conforms to the resistance to breakage test.The test takes the tubing, fixes one end, and applies a bending force to the other, cycling the tubing at an angle of up to 25 degrees for 20 cycles at 0.5 hz before being examined for breakage.A document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record showed no nonconforming events which could contribute to this failure mode.It should be noted there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Furthermore, the an instructions for use (ifu) is provided with the device.This ifu you states "this product is intended for use by physicians trained and experienced in diagnostic and interventional techniques.Standard techniques for placement of vascular access sheaths should be employed.Based on the information provided, the examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|