|
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Evaluation statement the complaint device was received and evaluated.Visually, it was observed that some free strand of suture, needle and the top hat were received separately.The broken "knot" portion of the suture was not returned.However, it can be confirmed that suture is broken, confirming this complaint.Based on the fraying on the suture, it is possible that an instrument used in the procedure caused this failure.For example, if the instrument is used with a more abrasive suture than orthocord it may leave abrasions on the instrument, or if the instrument receives an impact on the distal tip, that also could leave a sharp edge on the instrument.Other than this possibility we cannot discern a root cause for this failure.A batch record review has been conducted to determine if there were any internal processing issues which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.Our results indicate that this batch of product was processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the depuy mitek complaints system revealed one similar complaint for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.Based on the overall complaint rate for this failure mode, at this point in time, no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.(b)(4).This report is being filed from the remetrex complaint management system as required under mitek's corrective and preventative actions (capa) to file usa fda mdr missed malfunctions.
|