| Model Number |
GLJ-51-M |
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
| Date of Event |
06/27/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter: during bypass of gastroenterostomy, the needle broke.The procedure was completed with another device.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, during bypass gastroenterostomy, when the device was used on the patient, the needle broke.The procedure was completed with another device.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Evaluation summary: post market vigilance (pmv) led an evaluation of five devices.The visual inspection of the opened samples noted five needles.One needle was received broken near the tip and another was received bent near the tip.Upon microscopic inspection of the broken and bent needle, instrument marks were noted near to the broken/bent site.Microscopic inspection of the remaining needles noted instrument marks near the tip.Records from each manufacturing lot are thoroughly reviewed to ensure that products are released meeting all quality release specifications at the time of manufacture.The root cause of the observed damage was misuse of the product which caused or contributed to the reported condition.The needle should always be held in the middle where the diameter is greatest.Grasping the needle near the swaged end or the tip could cause bends or breaks or damage the connection between the needle and suture.No further actions have been deemed necessary at this time.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Evaluation summary: post market vigilance (pmv) led an evaluation of five devices.The visual inspection of the opened samples noted five needles.One needle was received broken near the tip and another was received bent near the tip.Upon microscopic inspection of the broken and bent needle, instrument marks were noted near to the broken/bent site.Microscopic inspection of the remaining needles noted instrument marks near the tip.Records from each manufacturing lot are thoroughly reviewed to ensure that products are released meeting all quality release specifications at the time of manufacture.The root cause of the observed damage was misuse of the product which caused or contributed to the reported condition.The needle should always be held in the middle where the diameter is greatest.Grasping the needle near the swaged end or the tip could cause bends or breaks, or damage the connection between the needle and suture.No further actions have been deemed necessary at this time.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|