|
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Mitek received the complaint device and evaluated it visually.Visually, it was observed that the suture with top hat still loaded was received and the suture is broken, confirming this complaint.The suture was examined closely under magnification and with the exception of breakage no other anomalies like fraying were observed.The structure of the suture appears intact.A batch record review has been conducted to determine if there were any internal processing issues which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.Our results indicate that this batch of product was processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the depuy mitek complaints system revealed no other complaints of any kind for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.At this point in time we cannot discern a root cause for the reported failure.Based on the overall complaint rate for this failure, no further action is warranted.However, depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.(b)(4).This report is being filed from the remetrex complaint management system as required under mitek's corrective and preventative actions (capa) to file usa fda mdr missed malfunctions.
|