Catalog Number 388335 |
Device Problem
Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
Edema (1820)
|
Event Date 06/05/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(6).A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the bd angiocath¿ autoguard¿ shielded iv catheter used on the patient caused hardening and edema at the puncture site.Occurrence happened after use.There was no report of exposure or injury noted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation summary: our quality engineer was unable to verify the reported complaint.Photos or samples are not available for analysis and because no objective evidence of this issue was found during the analysis of the device history record and quality notifications for the claimed lot, it was not possible to confirm this complaint as being generated by manufacturing process.Investigation conclusion: based on the investigation results to date the root cause was not determinate for the defect described in this complaint.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the bd angiocath¿ autoguard¿ shielded iv catheter used on the patient caused hardening and edema at the puncture site.Occurrence happened after use.There was no report of exposure or injury noted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Correction: due to an it issue beginning on 7/3/2018, previously filed emdrs did not contain required fields.This supplemental emdr is filed to provide the following omitted fields: event attributed to: required intervention.Device single use?: no.Device returned to manufacturer: no.This supplemental mdr also corrects the event description: it was reported that the bd angiocath¿ autoguard¿ shielded iv catheter used on the patient caused hardening and edema at the puncture site.The patient returned to the hospital presenting complaints at the puncture site.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the bd angiocath¿ autoguard¿ shielded iv catheter used on the patient caused hardening and edema at the puncture site.The patient returned to the hospital presenting complaints at the puncture site.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|