|
There was no known reported patient involvement associated with the complained event.Date of event: unknown when device malfunctioned.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.The subject device has been received and the product evaluation is in progress.No conclusion can be drawn.A review of the device history records has been requested and is currently pending completion.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device evaluated by mfr, device manufacture date: a device history record (dhr) review was conducted for part#: 03.503.118, synthes lot#: u178999: supplier lot#: u178999, release to warehouse date: 11jul2013; 14jan2014: supplier: orchid unique: no non-conformance reports (ncrs) were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any sub-components, which would contribute to this complaint condition.Device evaluated by mfr: a product investigation was conducted.The instrument was received with the reported condition of ¿visual deformed/bent: nrm & broken (2+ pieces) pre or post operatively/step unknown : nrm¿.The following investigation flow were performed: damage: visual (appearance not as expected).It was visually observed that the drill bit is not broken instead the distal tip is severely bent.The balance of the device is in fair condition.The received condition does agree with the complaint description for bent, however no for broken.The complaint is confirmed.Dimensional inspection was performed.Drill tip length and outer diameter at base of fluted shaft was measured and found to be within specification per relevant drawings.A review of the current design drawing and the drawing revision at the time of manufacture was performed and no issues were identified.Based on the available information it is not possible to determine a definitive root cause for the complaint condition a possible cause could be rough handling during the device¿s 5+ year lifespan has resulted in the complaint condition.During the investigation, no product design or manufacturing issues were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|