(b)(4).No lot number was provided.A device history record review was performed based upon a lot number from sales history data.A device history record review was performed on the epidural catheter and needle with no relevant findings.The ifu for this kit, e-17019-109a; rev.6, was reviewed as a part of this complaint investigation.The ifu warns the user, "never tug or quickly pull on catheter during removal from patient to reduce risk of catheter breakage.Do not apply additional tension on the catheter if catheter begins to stretch excessively.Reposition patient to open the vertebral interspaces and re-attempt removal if resistance is encountered or if catheter stretches excessively during removal.The ifu also provides alternate removal techniques if further resistance is encountered.The ifu states "stretch catheter slightly and tape it to skin, creating constant tension on the catheter." also, "injecting a small bolus of preservative-free saline while removing the catheter may be helpful." a corrective action is not required at this time.Based on the provided photos indicates operational context caused or contributed to this event.Complaint verification testing could not be performed as no sample was returned for analysis.However, the reported complaint of the catheter becoming damaged during removal was confirmed based on photos provided from the customer.Visual examination of the customer provided photos clearly reveal a damaged catheter.A device history record review was performed based upon a lot number from sales history data.A device history record review was performed on the epidural catheter and needle with no evidence to suggest a manufacturing related cause.Therefore, based on the photos provided, operational context caused or contributed to this event.
|