|
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The complaint device was received and evaluated.Visual observation confirms the distal tip of the anchor is broken, but is held in place by suture.When observed under magnification, no structural anomalies were observed that could have contributed to this failure.A batch review was conducted to determine if there were any internal processing issues, which would have contributed to the nature of the product complaint.Our results indicate that this batch was processed without incident and therefore there is no internally assignable cause for the reported problem.Further, a review into the mitek complaints system revealed no other complaints of any type for this lot of devices were released to distribution.We cannot discern a root cause for this failure.Based on the overall complaint rate for this failure, at this point in time, no further action is warranted.However, mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.(b)(4).This report is being filed from the remetrex complaint management system as required under mitek's corrective and preventative actions (capa) to file usa fda mdr missed malfunctions.
|