| Model Number |
AA07 |
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Burn(s) (1757); Burn, Thermal (2530)
|
| Date of Event |
07/06/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusion can be drawn.No evaluation was performed, as the device was not returned for evaluation.The device user manual warnings section includes instructions that heavy side loads and/or long operating times may cause the device to overheat.If the device overheats, discontinue use and rest the device by using it intermittently, or wrap the device in a moist sterile towel.Use of an overheated device may cause injury to the patient or operator.The preventive maintenance/service manual for the legend system specifies service intervals for devices based on the hospital usage level.The maximum specified service interval is 24 months.Device has been in use for approximately 125 months with no record of factory service during this period.We will continue to track and trend this complaint type.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the attachment suddenly overheats during spine surgery and the patient was burned in the operated area.It was reported that the patient is alive with injury and that no additional treatment was needed post - surgery.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On further follow up, it was confirmed that the patient was burned on the spine area.The patient is now healing.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Report confirmed.The device was tested and the temperature was measured to be 129 degree fahrenheit.The likely cause of failure could not be determined.It was also noted that there is no evidence that any other failures during analysis were found that may have contributed to this event.It was also noted that the rear nut was stuck in the attachment and could not be removed for further analysis.(b)(4) was added based on the initial report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|