|
Investigation - evaluation a review of the complaint history, drawings, dimensional verification, device history record, documentation, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, specifications, trends, quality control, and visual inspection of the returned device was conducted during the investigation.The customer returned one used and four unused device sets for evaluation.Visual inspection of the used set verified the needle was fractured approximately 1.5cm from the distal tip.Surface damage was not noted on the catheter.The unused devices were inspected visually and used in destructive testing in an attempt to replicate the reported failure.A document-based investigation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the finished product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record of the finished product shows one related nonconformance, however, this device was scrapped at quality control.A complaint history search revealed that there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Based on the information provided, examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, a definite root cause could not be determined.Per the [quality engineering] risk assessment, no further action is required.Monitoring will continue to be performed for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|