|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other incidents.Based on the information provided, the reported difficulties appear to be due to operational circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
It was reported that during a procedure of the anterior tibial (at) artery, during the initial inflation of the armada balloon dilatation catheter (bdc), the balloon ruptured below nominal pressure at the lesion.The device was removed and a different bdc was used in the procedure without issue.There was no reported adverse patient effect.There was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|