|
Model Number P152040 |
Device Problems
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
Patient Problems
Adhesion(s) (1695); Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Injury (2348); Disability (2371); Impaired Healing (2378); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.
The product was used for therapeutic treatment of an incarcerated ve ntral/incisional hernia.
It was reported that after a procedure where this device was implanted, the mesh tore along the midline.
The patient also experienced recurrence of both hernias, small-bowel obstruction, and adhesions.
Treatment included surgical lysis of adhesions, revision of the mesh, and later a full removal of the mesh.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.
The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a hernia.
It was reported that after a procedure where this device was implanted, the patient experienced mesh torn apart at midline, pain, abdominal wall sinus tract/mesh infection, recurrent incarcerated ventral hernia, small bowel obstruction, extensive lysis of adhesions, and two abdominal wall sinuses which have not healed.
Post-operative treatment included revision and removal surgery.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This information was received as a part of an extensive mesh litigation submission to medtronic.
The fda was notified of this large complaint receipt.
Due to the volume of complaint information received by medtronic, this resulted in a report beyond the 30 day target.
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.
The product was used for therapeutic treatment of a hernia.
It was reported that after the implant, the patient experienced mesh torn apart at midline, pain, abdominal wall sinus tract/mesh infection, recurrence, small bowel obstruction, adhesions, two abdominal wall sinuses which have not healed, and limited mobility.
Post-operative patient treatment included revision surgery, removal surgery, as well as lysis of adhesions.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|