• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAGNUS LINDQVIST SERVO-U; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAGNUS LINDQVIST SERVO-U; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 6694800
Device Problem Improper Flow or Infusion (2954)
Patient Problem Respiratory Acidosis (2482)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that while the ventilator was connected to a patient, the patient began to have increasing etco2 to the 70-90s, stacking breaths and total peep from auto peep.It was further stated that it appeared as if the valve was not opening to allow exhalation.The measured tidal volume was half the inhaled volume.The patients ph was 7.19 and co2 was 95.The ventilator was disconnected from the patient and the patient was bagged.The ventilator was replaced with another one.Ventilation with the new ventilator with same settings was without any problems and the patient was breathing comfortably.The patients etco2 decreased to the 50s.The final patient outcome was no injury.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Maquet medical systems,usa (importer) submits this report on behalf of the legal manufacturer of the device maquet cardiopulmonary ag kehler strasse 31, 76437 rastatt, germany.A follow-up medwatch will be submitted when additional information becomes available.Reference exemption #: e2018002.Importer- maquet medical systems usa 45 barbour pond drive wayne, nj 07470.Contact person: (b)(4).Additional information that was received from the user states that the day after the event the user reproduced the reported failure during simulated use test of the ventilator with the breathing circuit used at the time of the event.The user determined that the cause of the failure was the expiratory filter that was occluded.The expiratory filter is not manufactured or distributed by us.Our field service engineer was dispatched to the site for investigation of the device.No fault was found and no parts were replaced.The device logs were downloaded and the ventilator was returned back for clinical use.Evaluation of the received device log shows that pre-use check prior to and after the event was successfully performed.The logs including the trend log confirms a high airway pressure situation during the last hours of ventilation.The high measured peep is an indication of that the patient was not able to complete exhale during expiration due to an increased expiratory resistance.This situation leads to that a lower tidal volume than intended can be inspired.Our conclusion, based on the information received from customer and evaluation of the received device logs, is that the cause of the event was an occluded expiratory filter.There was no technical failure with the ventilator at the time of event.
 
Event Description
Manufacturer reference#: (b)(4).Importer reference #: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SERVO-U
Type of Device
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAGNUS LINDQVIST
maquet critical care ab
röntgenvägen 2, se-171 54
solna
SW 
MDR Report Key7772940
MDR Text Key116771033
Report Number8010042-2018-00417
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CBK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K151814
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/19/2018,02/26/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number6694800
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date07/19/2018
Device Age9 YR
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer07/19/2018
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/19/2018
Initial Date FDA Received08/10/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/19/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/26/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
-
-